Thursday, February 18, 2010

Student Teaching and Readicide

My student teaching is going great!! I taught my first lesson yesterday and was observed by my supervisor. Everything went great and I got some good feedback. I also had one of my students tell me that I was going to be a great teacher!:)
I implemented my first literacy engagement last week. The school that I am at as Silent Reading 2 days out of the month at the start of each period. I had my students use the knowledge chart that I found in the More Tools for Content Literacy book!! I had a good response from most of students and I was suprised how many students actually brought in their own personal books to read during Silent Reading. Through this activity I was able to see the different kinds of books that my students like to read and also see how they react to doing activities that peratin to reading.
My action research is directly related to content literacy involoving reading comprehension through business articles. I did my first lesson yesterday involving cooperative groups and reading. My students did a great job working together and talking through the text. They were able to better understnad the material that directly related tho the lesson.
I have finished reading Chapter 3 in Readicide and this is thus far my favorite chapter because it has perninent information for my action research!!
I hope everyone else is having a great time student teaching. See everyone Monday!

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Readicide

Prompt: My response to Readicide

WOW! So Chapter 2 was long but full of information. Gallagher discusses how his students who were ninth graders did not know who the Vice President of the United States was in 2007 and his 12th graders did not know who al Qaeda was after the U.S. being in war for almost 5 years.

I discussed this Chapter with a former teacher who is an avid reader and he mentioned knowing "too many" kids who did not know anything about our government and our society. He told me similar situations that he had in the classroom and he discussed all the people he knew that did not read books at all for fun. He said that too many people use the excuse that they do not have time to read. As I finished my discussion about Readicide with this man I began to feel sad.

Before now I have not ever read for fun but I know who the VP is and about the war in Iraq. So where is the gap? Gallagher talked about different students having different experiences growing up. He discussed how students in Wyoming knew what a farrier was but students in California did not recognize the word. The two sets of students had different prior knowledge growing up in different states.

Also Gallagher discusses that lower socioeconomic students have less access to books and to extensive vocabulary. Because of this teachers need to give the students as much access to BOOKS as possible.

I discussed in class the other day how at my high school I will be student teaching at soon, they are pulling students out of electives and social studies in order to give them more practice at math so they can pass a standardized test. This is so unfortunate and leads to the problem of our students not knowing who al Qaeda is or who the VP of the U.S. is!!

I like the idea of having an Article of the Week even if it doesn't link to the content. Chapter 2 was extremely helpful to me because I am going to do my Action Research project on reading comprehension by having students work with business articles throughout the week. I am excited about being able to bring in what is going on in the world around us and our students! I hope that I will find by giving the students different strategies in reading they will in turn begin to enjoy reading and be interested in what is going on in the real world!!

Monday, February 1, 2010

Readicide

Prompt: Response to Readicide. What is the message? What is your reaction? What are your connections to school experiences? What are ways you now understand will help students read more effectively in your discipline?

Gallagher's message is to inform us how schools are killing reading and what we can do about it. He lets us know his views on the current school system and that he believes schools are only teaching students how to be good test takers. Gallagher also believes that schools are limiting authentic reading experiences and working against developing independent readers. In chapter 1 he discusses 2 ways that harm young readers by emphasizing test preparation: 1) a curriculum steeped in multiple choice test preparation drives shallow teaching and learning 2)rather than lift up struggling readers, an emphasis on multiple choice test preparation ensures that struggling readers will continue to struggle (test preparation reading plays a large part in maintaining "apartheid schools"

My first reaction to the introduction and first chapter of Readicide was WOW! I could tell how strongly Gallagher fought about students and reading. He bluntly says that he does not agree with the way schools are teaching our students how to only be good test takers. He mentioned many statistics that were mind blogging such as the achievement gap and the progress (or lack there of) of NCLB. I think Gallagher does a great job of demonstrating how the Paige Paradox is hurting our students and is at the forefront of the readicide movement.

I have mentioned before that I experienced some struggle with vocabulary with my students but I have limited experience with reading comprehension within my content. I am currently learning strategies that will hopefully help me in my future experience as a teacher.
I have changed my research topic to include how to use graphic organizers to help students with vocabulary and in turn help build on their reading comprehension. Through reading Readicide and researching strategies on how to help students improve their reading comprehension I hope that I will have a better understanding of what is going on in the "typical" classroom and how to incorporate the "standards" plus literacy!